Mark_To_Model

Mark-to-Model Valuations: Definition and Implications

Key Takeaways

Mark-to-model assigns investment values based on financial models rather than real-time market prices, often requiring assumptions.
This method is used for illiquid or complex assets lacking adequate market pricing, leading to potential valuation risks.
Mark-to-model risks became apparent during the 2008 financial crisis due to mispriced securitized mortgages.
Since 2008, public companies must disclose assets valued with mark-to-model due to regulatory changes.
Investors should be cautious, as mark-to-model assets can expose them to higher risks and uncertain valuations.
Get personalized, AI-powered answers built on 27+ years of trusted expertise.

What Is Mark-to-Model?

Mark-to-model is a method for valuing assets without regular market pricing, relying on financial models and assumptions. This contrasts with traditional mark-to-market valuations, in which market prices are used to calculate values as well as the losses or gains on positions.

Assets that must be marked-to-model either don't have a regular market that provides accurate pricing or have valuations that rely on a complex set of reference variables and timeframes. This creates a situation in which guesswork and assumptions must be used to assign value to an asset, which makes the asset riskier.

Understanding Mark-to-Model Valuation

Mark-to-model valuations are used primarily in illiquid markets on products that don't trade often. Mark-to-model assets essentially leave themselves open to interpretation, and this can create risk for investors. Legendary investor, Warren Buffett, termed this method of valuation as "marking to myth," due to the underpricing of risk.1

The dangers of mark-to-model assets occurred during the subprime mortgage meltdown beginning in 2007 due to this mispricing of risk and therefore of the assets. Billions of dollars in securitized mortgage assets had to be written off on company balance sheets because the valuation assumptions turned out to be inaccurate. Many of the mark-to-model valuations assumed liquid and orderly secondary markets and historical default levels. These assumptions proved wrong when secondary liquidity dried up and mortgage default rates spiked well above normal levels.2

Largely as a result of the balance sheet problems faced with securitized mortgage products, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued a statement in November 2007 requiring all publicly traded companies to disclose any assets on their balance sheets that rely on mark-to-model valuations beginning in the 2008 fiscal year.3

Levels of Asset Valuation: Level One, Two, and Three

FASB Statement 157 introduced a classification system that aims to bring clarity to the financial asset holdings of corporations. Assets (as well as liabilities) are divided into three categories:

Level 1

Level 2

Level 34

Level 1 assets are valued according to observable market prices. These marked-to-market assets include Treasury securities, marketable securities, foreign currencies, commodities, and other liquid assets for which current market prices can be readily obtained.4

Level 2 assets are valued based on quoted prices in inactive markets and/or indirectly rely on observable inputs such as interest rates, default rates, and yield curves. Corporate bonds, bank loans, and over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives fall into this category.4

Finally, Level 3 assets are valued with internal models. Prices are not directly observable and assumptions, which can be subject to wide variances, must be made in mark-to-model asset valuation. Examples of mark-to-model assets are distressed debt, complex derivatives, and private equity shares.4

Get personalized, AI-powered answers built on 27+ years of trusted expertise.

Berkshire Hathaway. "2002 Annual Report," Page 13. Accessed June 9, 2021.

International Monetary Fund. "IMF Survey: Credit Market Turmoil Makes Valuation Key." Accessed June 9, 2021.

Financial Accounting Standards Board. "Summary of Statement No. 157." Accessed June 9, 2021.

Financial Accounting Standards Board. "Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157," Pages 12-16. Accessed June 9, 2021.

Investing

Portfolio Management